Re: [SLUG] C# decompiler coded

From: Paul M Foster (paulf@quillandmouse.com)
Date: Mon Apr 09 2001 - 17:26:02 EDT


On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:44:17PM -0400, Tina Gasperson wrote:

> Yes, but don't you think it is odd that no one on the other side (our side)
> has made much of it either? If it was a big deal or potentially damaging to
> MS, Slashdot and Linuxtoday would be all over it - right?
>
> -t
>

I get the impression that in the open source world, .Net and C# are
kinda ho-hum. I'm not sure anyone much cares. Besides, only a very few
people would really be interested in a C# decompiler. On top of all
that, Microsoft still hasn't laid all its card on the table with regard
to their .Net stuff. I think a _lot_ of people are just waiting to see
what finally happens.

Paul

> On Monday 09 April 2001 15:09, you wrote:
> > Tina Gasperson wrote:
> > > So, how common would be it be for someone to gain access to a network
> > > using .Net tools?
> > > -tina
> > >
> > > On Monday 09 April 2001 12:15, you wrote:
> > > > The language of ms's .NET, C#, evidently now has decompiler available:
> > > > http://thebusiness.vnunet.com/News/1120202
> > > > Malicious hackers will be able to wreak havoc with this tool.
> > > > And it couldn't happen to a bunch of nicer guys!
> > > > Smitty
> >
> > The PR mavens at m$ don't want this to spread around, so naturally they
> > are doing what is called in the PR trade, a anti-narrative.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:24:36 EDT