Norbert Cartagena wrote:
>
<snip>
>
> The reason I asked to compare is because I was (oddly enough) looking at
> mine too and got this (I have approximatelly 1/2 the RAM you do, a but
> more than 1/2)
>
> total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
> Mem: 195186688 123957248 71229440 0 13533184 56029184
> Swap: 213848064 0 213848064
> MemTotal: 190612 kB
> MemFree: 69560 kB
> MemShared: 0 kB
> Buffers: 13216 kB
> Cached: 54716 kB
> Active: 24352 kB
> Inact_dirty: 43580 kB
> Inact_clean: 0 kB
> Inact_target: 48 kB
> HighTotal: 0 kB
> HighFree: 0 kB
> LowTotal: 190612 kB
> LowFree: 69560 kB
> SwapTotal: 208836 kB
> SwapFree: 208836 kB
>
> Now, I've been looking at some notes on the Kernel mailers about this
> and noticed that I had a much bigger Inact_dirty number than the files I
> kept lookng at. Thanks for the explanation ;)
>
> Norb
>
Oh the terrible burden we have to bear -- having too much RAM and
all....
Ed.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:27:06 EDT