Re: [SLUG] SoundBlaster Problem

From: patrick (onepatrick@ozline.net)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2001 - 21:43:20 EDT


On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, you wrote:
> I'm a newbie to Linux and I just installed Mandrake 7.2 on my system. I am
> hoping someone can give me a hand with a problem I am having.When I went to
> configure my SB. 32 it gave me an error of
> /lib/modules/202.17-21mdk/misc/sb.0:
> init_module:Device or resource busy
> /lib/modules/2.2.17-21mdk/misc/sb.0:
> insmod
> /llb/modules/22.17-21mdk/misc/sb.0
> failed
> Any help I can get would be appreciated.

and maybe someone can help me to figure out how to
use kNode . its in kde and supposed to read newsgroups, but
i can figure out if it will do this by itself or do i need any other
program to make it work.

thanks pat
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "patrick" <onepatrick@ozline.net>
> To: <slug@nks.net>
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 9:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Gnome 1.4
>
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, you wrote:
> > > Smitty wrote:
> > > >> Tim Spalding wrote:
> > > >> Mandrake has had RPMs on their cooker sites for a little while now.
>
> I
>
> > > >> haven't tried any yet, though. At this rate, I'm probably going to
>
> wait
>
> > > >> for Mandrake 8 to go gold, download the ISO images, and either
>
> upgrade
>
> > > >> or install fresh.
> >
> > i think people should buy from the distros. look how much they have done
> > for us. the people the distros employ need to have jobs too.
> > i dont see anything wrong with getting freebees, but if u can afford it
> > put your money where your mouth is.
> >
> > :)
>
> ftp://ftp.twoguys.org/pub/linux/distributions/mandrake/devel/cooker/Mand
>
> > > >>rake/RPMS is a good, fast location to grab newer Mandrake packages
>
> from.
>
> > > > How about purchasing the distribution and help to keep them in
>
> business!
>
> > > Hmmm... Mainly? Been there, done that. Have multiple T-shirts to
> > > show for it.
> > >
> > > Mainly, I'd consider it a waste of material, since I don't really have
>
> any
>
> > > use for either the support service, the manuals, or even the bundled
>
> apps.
>
> > > (Open Source is pretty much the way I go, anyway.)
> > >
> > > Why force a distribution manufacturer to incur expense for what I'm
> > > perfectly capable of getting myself?
> > >
> > > If someone who's already been using Linux for a while wants to support
> > > a distribution maker, wouldn't it make more sense to save them the
> > > expense
>
> of
>
> > > a would-be-unused box set and just send them the money directly in the
>
> form
>
> > > of a contribution?
> > >
> > > Think about it.
> >
> > --
> > Love is all u need, Love is all u need, Love is all u need.

-- 
Love is all u need, Love is all u need, Love is all u need.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:41:00 EDT