On Saturday 12 May 2001 07:07 pm, you wrote:
> > actually no i wasnt trying to drive traffic. if the article is correct
> > and gnome's players are in trouble i suggested they join
> > up with the KDE team. if the article is inaccurate then i guess
> > i did drive up the traffic inadvertently. i do have opinion and i
> > am not wishing gnome people any bad will . that is why
> > i was asking around to get some verification about the article.
>
> As for GNOME, "More bugs than a house in Florida"? HUH?
You say your experience is current. I will have you know that MY House here
in Florida DOES NOT have buggs.
Ups got to go one is trying to take me away. NO! NO! GET AWAY. I Don't have
any bugs.
Got to go. My Buggs are calling.
Frank
> From experience
> here I can tell you that Gnome works fine (at least up to 1.2, and I'm
> not sure about the version shipping with Drake, which I find tends to be
> buggier than most distros). It has about as many bugs as KDE, though KDE
> is an older generally more advanced desktop whose major problem is that
> it is un-immaginative (I'm tired of people telling me that a
> Windows-Like GUI is the only "user friendly" GUI and I refuse to believe
> that that's as "intuitive" as things can get). Gnome is trying to head
> in a somewhat different direction, which explains why the bugs are more
> notable. You can "se" what they "try" to do. Due to that, age aside I
> consider it the supersior desktop.
>
> (For the record, I use Gnome on my Laptop and KDE on my desktop, so my
> experience is pretty current.)
>
> Norb
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:31:57 EDT