Re: [SLUG] How come no OEM dual-boot machines?

From: Russell Hires (rhires@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 22:35:50 EDT


> Must be nice to be a monopoly.

The Linux version of this would be that any machine that shipped would _have_
to be at least a dual boot, preferably a triple boot.

Russell :-)

On Tuesday 28 August 2001 18:30, you wrote:
> Here's a link from another list that I thought very interesting when I
> read the story.
>
> http://www.byte.com/documents/s=1115/byt20010824s0001/
>
> The short version is that Microsoft's OEM license, which is confidential
> and is labeled a "trade secret" prohibits OEMs from shipping dual boot
> machines. If you're going to ship Windows, there can't be any other boot
> options for other OSes.
>

>
> Paul



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:11:29 EDT