On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 11:39:43PM -0500, Miller, Matt wrote:
> Why is an expressed view of *anger* instead of *compassion* deemed as hate?
> We can *pray* for the victims, but can't we also feel angry outbursts
> towards the alleged propagators of this heinous act? I know I ran the full
> gamut of emotions Tuesday: fear, compassion, and anger. I believe these were
> normal reactions, and I don't believe anyone has the right to censor my
> emotions.
> If the off-topic posts about the need for love and compassion are
> appropriate, then I believe the reactionary posts of anger are as well.
> If we want to stress that [CORRECTION:] Andrew's thread should be moved to
> the politics list, then I believe the entire thread should have been moved
> to politics list from the outset.
>
And you are correct. So in the interest of the list, let's move it there
or drop it.
Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:12:07 EDT