Yeah, I wasn't concerned with the CPU but the network throughput. Are
both boxen on the same network feed?
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Derek Glidden wrote:
> Mark wrote:
> >
> > Oh Christ, you linked it to nks.com
> >
> > The list email traffic is going to take longer now.
>
> Nah, the list server and the web server are two different boxen.
>
> Besides, we're seeing 500 and 600 simultaneous connections on the web
> server and still 'top' is reporting 90% CPU idle time.
>
> Sweeeet!
>
> (Although somewhat sad to say, the box is a 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of
> RAM. It would be much nicer to say it was a 486/66 with 16MB of RAM and
> handling things that well. :)
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> $_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$t=255;@t=map
> {$_%16or$t^=$c^=($m=(11,10,116,100,11,122,20,100)[$_/16%8])&110;
> $t^=(72,@z=(64,72,$a^=12*($_%16-2?0:$m&17)),$b^=$_%64?12:0,@z)
> [$_%8]}(16..271);if((@a=unx"C*",$_)[20]&48){$h=5;$_=unxb24,join
> "",@b=map{xB8,unxb8,chr($_^$a[--$h+84])}@ARGV;s/...$/1$&/;$d=
> unxV,xb25,$_;$e=256|(ord$b[4])<<9|ord$b[3];$d=$d>>8^($f=$t&($d
> >>12^$d>>4^$d^$d/8))<<17,$e=$e>>8^($t&($g=($q=$e>>14&7^$e)^$q*
> 8^$q<<6))<<9,$_=$t[$_]^(($h>>=8)+=$f+(~$g&$t))for@a[128..$#a]}
> print+x"C*",@a}';s/x/pack+/g;eval
>
> usage: qrpff 153 2 8 105 225 < /mnt/dvd/VOB_FILENAME \
> | extract_mpeg2 | mpeg2dec -
>
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/
> http://www.eff.org/ http://www.anti-dmca.org/
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/293/5537/2028
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Mark Bishop (mark@bish.net) | Computer Engineer |
| 813-253-2197 | Network Engineer |
| http://bish.net | Embedded Programmer |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:38:14 EDT