As far as my experience, Lexmark printers are a beast to get to work with
Linux. HPs usually (the spendy ones, that is) work, but I just don't like the
print quality on HPs. That about covers my entire $.02.
Glen
> I don't know what it means now, but Lexmark was IBM's printer division
> before being sold off as a seperate unit. I've had good operational luck
> with them, but no experience under Linux.
>
> VT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:48:25 EDT