Well, in the immortal words of Yours Truly(r), 'A strong bias doth not a
strong case make'.
Personally, with dri enabled with my voodoo3, I can get up to 260fps
depending the app. The lowest I have seen from any app with dri is about
35fps. Very acceptable to me, I think.
*Most* hardware runs faster under Linux. Video cards are still in the realm
of stingy docs, so they are the worst fardware to try to benchmark under
Linux - we have to figure them out on our own. Let's see MS do that and get
benchmarks like we do.
Glen
On Sunday 09 December 2001 15:28, you wrote:
> hey folks... i've read about 4 sites and seen some graphs .
> the last site (admittedly pro-linux), http://www.jimmo.com/Linux-NT_Debate/
> said that once windows was tweaked positively and linux tweaked negatively,
> windows was, in benchmarks, 1.5 better than linux.
> One site showed many different tests between linux and nt (one being the
> mindcraft test), and showed that windows served many more pages per second
> than linux as a web server. Another site--a linux gaming site
> http://linuxgames.com/articles/comparison/ -- rated the frames per second
> served by 3 different
> video cards under linux vs. windows; linux was significantly lower than
> windows with every card (even when the company had special drivers for
> linux)!
> I know this is an extremely
> vague question, but does hardware perform better under linux or windows?!!
>
> sorry in advance.... hehehe.... :-/
>
> =====
> ________________
>
> Justin Keyes
> m9u35@yahoo.com
> ________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:04:11 EDT