RE: [SLUG] time warner port blocking

From: Father Timothy (irisinc@tbi.net)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2002 - 23:08:53 EST


TBI is basically a broadband retailer. They do have the basic ISP
business which is how they started. I think they told me they have 300
DSL customers. I have a static IP and a 384 up and down as that is all
I can get in this part of town.

The nice thing is you get Eithernet at the modem. No need for PPPOE or
any of those other schemes. Plug in and go.

Prices seem to be competitive.

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 1/30/2002 at 6:18 PM Ken Billings wrote:

>I checked out their website, but it was a little light on details.
I'll
>possibly give them a call tomorrow, but does anyone happen to know
anything
>about their business DSL, like a general pricing scheme?
>Also, anyone on the list have any personal experience (positive or
>negative)
>with them as a company?
>
>-Ken
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: slug@lists.nks.net [mailto:slug@lists.nks.net]On Behalf Of
Father
>Timothy
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 04:59 PM
>To: slug@nks.net
>Subject: RE: [SLUG] time warner port blocking
>
>
>Try WebNet @ http://www.tbi.net
>
>Rusty
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 1/30/2002 at 11:03 AM Ken Billings wrote:
>
>>So, on that note... What are some of the better DSL providers
>available
>>around here? I'm looking for a decent price on a 768/384 absolute
>minimum
>>speed. I'd prefer one that is techie friendly - i.e. low bandwidth
>servers
>>allowed, email/web space optional, and reverse DNS would be icing. ;)
>I
>>know _someone_ on the list is happy with their ISP, right? ...right?
>Is an
>>ISP that just provides a connection, no questions asked, available
>without
>>paying hundreds of dollars for a "business" account?
>>
>>As of right now things are cool in St. Petersburg. If they ever do
>start
>>port blocking, I'll be canceling my roadrunner account, no question.
>>Service in the last year+ has been phenomenal (down only once the
>night
>>they
>>upgraded the whole Tampabay area), and speeds have been great, but at
>this
>>point I just can't live without my servers. ;)
>>
>>-Ken
>>
>>BTW, do you know who's on the other end of the complaint line? In
>other
>>words, would it do any good to call and complain in advance? :)
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: slug@lists.nks.net [mailto:slug@lists.nks.net]On Behalf Of
>>Grantham, Patrick
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 09:22 AM
>>To: 'slug@nks.net'
>>Cc: Klawon, Kevin (MVCI)
>>Subject: [SLUG] time warner port blocking
>>
>>
>>If you have not found out yet, TWC is blocking incomming tcpip port
80
>for
>>their residentianl customers in central florida. Accosding to the
>tech
>>support (and testing proves it to be true) they are presently
blocking
>only
>>incomming port 80. Examining my apache log files, this apparently
>(and
>>covertly) started Jan 24. Is anyone else experiencing this?
Pleading
>with
>>the tech support, "Please open it up for me, I use Linux," proved not
>to be
>>helpful. I conveyed my displeasure not having been notifued to this
>>impending change. He just gave me a number to call to complain. Is
>anyone
>>else experiencing this?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:03:50 EDT