[SLUG] DHCP or BIND

• Next message: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG] Ok, I'm bored."
• Previous message: Logan: "[SLUG] Bah!!!! was 35 bucks now its 6!"
• Next in thread: Jason Copenhaver: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: Jason Copenhaver: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: Josh Tiner: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND - Wally can do it too!"
• Maybe reply: Steven Johnson: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: Josh Tiner: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND - Wally can do it too!"
• Reply: Kai Lien: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: R P Herrold: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I've never really untangled DNS for myself, but I'm working on
understanding it right now. One question comes up that I don't seem to
have an answer for. I know there's a dhcpcd, which grabs an IP address
from a nameserver. And I know there's BIND, which serves up IP
addresses. I thought there was a DHCP server daemon as well, which
would perform the function of serving up IP addresses on small networks.
Is that not the case, or do I need to run BIND to hand out IP addresses?

Paul

• Next message: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG] Ok, I'm bored."
• Previous message: Logan: "[SLUG] Bah!!!! was 35 bucks now its 6!"
• Next in thread: Jason Copenhaver: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: Jason Copenhaver: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: Josh Tiner: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND - Wally can do it too!"
• Maybe reply: Steven Johnson: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: Josh Tiner: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND - Wally can do it too!"
• Reply: Kai Lien: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Reply: R P Herrold: "Re: [SLUG] DHCP or BIND"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:04:13 EDT