Re: [SLUG] Cable to DSL conversion

From: keith.kepner@us.pwcglobal.com
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 18:46:55 EST


I can remember when I got my first bike..............{ouch}

                                                                                                                   
                    Mark
                    <mark@bish.net To: SLUG <slug@nks.net>
> cc:
                    Sent by: Subject: Re: [SLUG] Cable to DSL conversion
                    slug@lists.nks
                    .net
                    02/15/2002
                    01:31 PM
                                                                                                                   
                    Please respond
                    to slug
                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                   

PPoE? Ouch, not the best in the world.

On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Bill wrote:

> Woo hoo!!!!!!!!!!!! It's here! It's here!
>
> The techie from Ameritech called at 8:10 am to verify what equipment she
> needed to bring. By 9:10, she was gone and it was working on ONE Windows
> machine.
>
> I set the Linksys router to PPoE and applied the change, then adjusted
the
> cabling (basically just had to move the wire from the cable modem to the
DSL
> modem). Reboot everybody and I'm back in business. :-) It was that
simple.
> She left behind a SpeedStream 5260 modem and 5 line filters which I don't
> seem to need.
>
> My DSL contract calls for 768/128 with one IP.
>
> Here's what the Ameritech lady says I have:
> Down Up
> Min 768 160
> Max 6987 727
>
> It *does* feel "frisky". One thing I am noticing that is dramatically
> different is that it takes Kmail a LOT less time to upload an email. I am
> accustomed to about a 10 second wait. What is funky about this is that I
am
> still on the Comcast email servers and still connected via the same eth0
> through the same router. Why would the behavior of Kmail change when all
I
> have changed is the mode of transmission?
>
> Okay ... so the basic setup was a breeze. I still have lots more work to
do.
>
> I can't find fault, of any sort, with anything I have experienced so far.
The
> line came up immediately, the speed is excellent, both Ameritech and
WWNET
> have done exactly as they said they would ... so far it's all good. The
one
> surprise (Kmail) is a good one.
>
> Bill
>
> --
> We're sorry, but due to ongoing security concerns, we no longer accept
e-mail
> attachments created by Microsoft applications. Please accept our
apologies for
> any inconvenience. -- Staff & Management
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Mark Bishop (mark@bish.net) | Computer Engineer |
| 813-253-2197 | Network Engineer |
| http://bish.net | Embedded Programmer |

----------------------------------------------------------------
        The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
        entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
        privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
        other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
        information by persons or entities other than the intended
        recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
        contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:10:58 EDT