But then you can't depend on the satellite being there
*geosynchronous*; that means you'll have to move your antennae with
the 17,500mph orbiting satellite.
/mario
>Mark wrote:
>>You don't want a satellite network - trust me on this. I'll capture some
>>latency outputs next time I get some uplink time. It sucks.
>
>This can be cured. A geosynchronous orbit is too far away. I've
>emailed the Internation Astrophysical Union and asked them to move
>it closer to get rid of the latency problem.
>
>- Robin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:54:57 EDT