yes
no
yes
respectfully submitted by:
Michael C. Rock
"eschew obfuscation"
-----Original Message-----
From: slug@lists.nks.net [mailto:slug@lists.nks.net]On Behalf Of Smitty
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:42 PM
To: slug@nks.net
Subject: [SLUG] Partition type question
I am going to transfer data from an old to a new harddrive. The new one is
double (40 gb) the size of the old (20 gb). The old has four partitions,
one
for /, one for /boot, one for /home and one for swap. I believe these are
all primary partitions. I would like to have more partitions, namely one
for
/var and /tmp together. Am I correct that I would need to use extended
partitions rather than primary?
Do extended partitions create any corruption problems for data as opposed to
primary partitions?
I noticed Russ Herrold puts each directory on a seperate extended partition.
Does this have advantages over keeping /bin, /sbin, /lib, /etc/, /usr, and
/opt together on the / partition?
Regards,
Smitty
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:12:11 EDT