Re: [SLUG] Sendmail or Qmail?

From: Greg Schmidt (slugmail@gschmidt.net)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 16:46:59 EDT

Next message: John Clay: "[SLUG] How to automount NT network drives??"
Previous message: Derek Glidden: "Re: [SLUG] Partitioning (Again?!)"
In reply to: Matthew Moen: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail or Qmail?"
Next in thread: marrandy: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail or Qmail?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I second Matt's motion for postfix instead of sendmail or qmail.

I like postfix. It's easy. It's clean. It just plain works.

If you want an MTA you owe it to yourself to take a look at postfix.

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Matthew Moen wrote:

> ...a bunch of neat stuff about postfix...
>
>
> Thus spake Ronan Heffernan on the 19 day of the 09 month in the year 2002:
>
> > ...a bunch of neat stuff about qmail...
> >
>
>

Next message: John Clay: "[SLUG] How to automount NT network drives??"
Previous message: Derek Glidden: "Re: [SLUG] Partitioning (Again?!)"
In reply to: Matthew Moen: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail or Qmail?"
Next in thread: marrandy: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail or Qmail?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:48:24 EDT