Re: [SLUG] U are mistaken. Is possible for you NOT to editorialize?

From: patrick grantham (pwgrant@cssi-fl.com)
Date: Sat Jan 11 2003 - 15:03:23 EST

Next message: Joe Brandt: "Re: [SLUG] re: A new idea?"
Previous message: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] U are mistaken. Is possible for you NOT to editorialize?"
In reply to: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] U are mistaken. Is possible for you NOT to editorialize?"
Next in thread: cpace@tampabay.rr.com: "Re: [SLUG] U are mistaken. Is possible for you NOT to editorialize?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks. I'll take a look at fetchmail and procmail.

Next message: Joe Brandt: "Re: [SLUG] re: A new idea?"
Previous message: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] U are mistaken. Is possible for you NOT to editorialize?"
In reply to: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] U are mistaken. Is possible for you NOT to editorialize?"
Next in thread: cpace@tampabay.rr.com: "Re: [SLUG] U are mistaken. Is possible for you NOT to editorialize?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 13:19:03 EDT