Re: [SLUG] Sendmail (Was CD burner)

From: Matt Miller (mmiller1@mptotalcare.com)
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 17:15:14 EST

Next message: Josh Tiner: "RE: [SLUG] 52X CD RW drive @ TCWO <-- stop /pickin/ on me!"
Previous message: kwan@digitalhermit.com: "RE: [SLUG] 52X CD RW drive @ TCWO"
In reply to: Matt Moen: "[SLUG] Sendmail (Was CD burner)"
Next in thread: Levi Bard: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail (Was CD burner)"
Reply: Levi Bard: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail (Was CD burner)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:43, Matt Moen wrote:
> 9 out of 10 masochists prefer sendmail to the other leading brand!
>
> (For those unfamiliar, Postfix is the other leading brand, with Exim and
> qmail trailing.)
>
> *Ducks for ensuing MTA war*

I think we've treaded the pros and cons of the various MTA's already;
how about an emacs vs. vi debate? or how about Picard vs. Kirk?
:)

-- 
Matt Miller
Systems Administrator
MP TotalCare
gpg public key id: 
08BC7B06
-- An improperly trained Samurai dies quickly.

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Next message: Josh Tiner: "RE: [SLUG] 52X CD RW drive @ TCWO <-- stop /pickin/ on me!"
Previous message: kwan@digitalhermit.com: "RE: [SLUG] 52X CD RW drive @ TCWO"
In reply to: Matt Moen: "[SLUG] Sendmail (Was CD burner)"
Next in thread: Levi Bard: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail (Was CD burner)"
Reply: Levi Bard: "Re: [SLUG] Sendmail (Was CD burner)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 14:06:45 EDT