Hmm... So would a gig be enough or do you think more would be needed?
Chris Short, SrA USAF
shortc@centcom.mil
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Coyle [mailto:brian@linuxwidows.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 10:26 PM
To: slug@nks.net
Subject: Re: [SLUG] /tmp Partition
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 April 2003 22:10, Short SrA Christopher wrote:
> Follow on to Linux Partitioning:
>
> I've been getting some mixed signals about whether or not to actually
> put /tmp in a separate partition or not. When answering this question
> keep in mind that this is for a home desktop PC.
>
> I honestly think that /tmp being in its own partition would keep
> fragmentation down but it could have some negative side effects when
> /tmp files up. What do you folks think? What would be a safe size?
>
If /tmp is under the root and that fills up you'll be in a bigger world of
hurt than if it's a separate filesystem.
Also, if your desktop users will be using Mozilla, be aware Moz uses /tmp
(unless an ENV var is set) to store downloads until complete. Then it
moves the file to the real destination. This bit me big time just
the other day...
Best option- Make /tmp it's own filesystem and as large as you have space
to spare.
- --
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Brian Coyle, GCIA
http://www.giac.org/GCIA.php
iD8DBQE+reLGER3MuHUncBsRAjxxAJwMEx6ippo3haveGvuw5LmQTkTOAwCfVIYH
iF2xkdnQ848smxI6F5tKhA0=
=WM8b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:41:57 EDT