On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:55:19PM -0400, Ken Elliott wrote:
> >>I've heard it said that "Windows" as Microsoft uses the term has become a
> generic term.
>
> "Has become"? Ummm.... I think I disagree. The term "windows" was a generic
> term BEFORE MS Windows was on the market, not after.
>
> My tiny brain easily forgets things, so I pulled out a 1984 copy of Byte's
> "Guide to the IBM PC". Byte published an article titled "Five window
> managers for the IBM PC" (Digital Research's GEM, IBM's TopView,
> WindowMaster, DesQ, and VisiOn). Some of these products were two years old,
> and MS Windows was not yet shipping. There are ads all over the magazine
> for software to create windows. Clearly windows was generic and Microsoft
> hijacked the term.
"Windows" != "window managers". Yes, "window" and "window manager" are
generic terms. But "Windows" as a trademark owned by Microsoft to
designate a "graphical user interface based operation system for desktop
computers" is not generic. It sounds like you're trying to make the case
that Microsoft used this idea of a "window" or "window manager" in
coming up with the name "Windows" for their OS. Perhaps. But I can't
hold that against them. Were I in their position, I would likely have
done the same thing. It's a good marketing/business move. But if you
truly think it's just a generic term, you're welcome to test the waters
as Lindows did. Maybe you'll have better luck. ;-}
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:59:14 EDT