Backward Thinker wrote:
>>Actually, a "bwa" is more reserved for instances of high hilarity. > It's difficult to maintain any evil dignity when emitting BWAs,
>>after all. Compare the following for aesthetic value:
>>01001101 01010111 01000001 vs. 01000010 01010111 01000001 (MWA vs.
>>BWA)
>>01001101 01110111 01100001 vs. 01000010 01110111 01100001 (Mwa vs.
>>Bwa)
>>01101101 01110111 01100001 vs. 01100010 01110111 01100001 (mwa vs.
>>bwa)
>>There is clearly more of a stately pattern to the M and m than to
>>the B and b. While it's true that a capital B is palindromatic in
>>binary expression, that is hardly a recommendation, being little
>>more than a demonstration of the ability to recognize simple
>>symmetry. Meanwhile, in both the capitalized and lower-case forms,
>>the letter M demonstrates a more sophisticated grasp of construction
>>of progressive patterning. Additionally, its understated sense of
>>control is evident in the pronouncement of the phoneme, as opposed
>>to the more vulgar explosive consonant B.
>
>
> EBCDIC has more of an evil villain ring than ASCII... I mean, just look at it:
>
> MWA:
> 11010100 11100110 11000001
> MUA:
> 11010100 11100100 11000001
> BWA:
> 11000010 11100110 11000001
>
> Mwa:
> 11010100 10100110 10000001
> Mua:
> 11010100 10100100 10000001
> Bwa:
> 11000010 10100110 10000001
>
> mwa:
> 10010100 10100110 10000001
> mua:
> 10010100 10100100 10000001
> bwa:
> 10000010 10100110 10000001
>
> (shudders)
>
> Anyway, I defer to the experts for further analysis (not that any was ever needed!)
> ~ Daniel
"What . . . is your prognosis . . . for the horse, Bones?"
"It's dead, Jim."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:04:44 EDT