Robert Foxworth wrote:
>
> I haven't specifically checked 9x, but perhaps his ping test is with
> a win9x machine. I seem to recall there was a step in granularity
> between 1 and 10 ms in the RTT resolved (shown) time. We get "spoiled"
> with Linux and its much more precise RTT display. I know that
> the ping utility in XP will show the difference between say 9 and 10
> ms, and will show <1 ms. (the RTT to my firewall, on 10 Mbit)
Your post made me recall something from way back...
I spent the last ten minutes trying to pull up a Usenet comment I posted
several years ago concerning Samba running pathetically slowly on
win9x networks. There was one really odd suggestion that someone had
made -- map a drive instead of accessing through explorer. At first I'd
dismissed it, but when I tried it radically improved the performance. It
could have been a coincidence, and I've not had reason to try it out
again, but if nothing else is working...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:15:47 EDT