On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:32:40AM -0400, Robert Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 22:43:40 -0400, Bob Stia <rnr@sanctum.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2004 03:14 pm, Robert Snyder wrote:
> >
> > > All I saying it is in i post i poked fun at bush next one might be
> > > about kerry or ralph nader... I dont care.... everyone is open game
> > > during the electon plain and simple
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yeah OK, BUT....NOT on this list OK ??? Please???
> >
> > Bob S.
>
> I Just going to say look at Roblimo's post on this. Plain and simple
> he said it better than I can.
Robin's _original_ post on this thread was harmless. _Your_ post was the
first to introduce current political candidates, thus turning the thread
truly toward politics.
> Also I have not seen my comments caused politcal flame war.
The point is that I don't want it to _get_ to a political flame war.
Fortunately, (and to the credit of list members) most people have acted
with restraint to prevent it from becoming a flame war.
> Also if
> you get real techincal about this. It states the the slug-politics
> list is for and I qoute " when heated topics get started on the
> "slug-list" This is far from a heated topic. It become one either.
Please don't force me to revise the list guidelines because people want
to get "technical" about the rules. _Technically_, politics is not
permitted on the SLUG list. Mentioning current political figures running
for office is most certainly politics.
Let's move on, shall we?
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:43:39 EDT