Mario Lombardo wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I was expecting this, and I expect that BRU will see a socket and deny as
>well. Yes, it is a glorified GNU Tar program :), but I use it because it's
>easier to point to a corporate entity when it comes to legal issues of
>intellectual property loss. Quite frankly, I highly DO NOT recommend folks
>using Tolisgroup's BRU. Their support is terrible. I went as far as the R&D
>person, and he didn't think an upgrade would fix a problem. The support
>people said it would. Go figure.
>
>
Having used BRU in the past as well, I can honestly say it's a load of
crap. Avoid it.
There are other good commercial backup packages for Linux now, if that's
really what you're looking for.
>The whole rest of the operation uses opensource stuff. It's just the backup
>that's proprietary. Pretty soon, I may be using AMANDA anyway :(
>
>
Amanda really is a good little backup tool.
- Ian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:07:32 EDT