You say it failed on disk 2 and then you selected all packages on the
second pass. Is it possible there is an error in Fedora's ability to
resolve dependancies correctly? The RPM fails and a generic message is
provided? The same xorg-x11 file was where the "corrupt message" was on
two seperately burned disks of FC3 for me. If it is some burn
corruption, I'd be surprised if it was the same RPM. And again, they
passed the media check.
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 10:32, Robert Snyder wrote:
> Imation is made by 3M which uses syntheic dye. It really should not
> matter. I found though with them that pushing syntheics to the edge
> seems to give some problems with some things. Example SVCD/VCD might
> chop a movie in to halves but it be right at the edge. I have times
> with sythenics where the last couple minutes of the svcd are all
> foobared up good. Though I typically dont do media check on the cds as
> that system is usually foobared. Example FC2 i downloaded the iso on
> windows compared the md5sums they all matched perfectly. Opened up
> Virtual PC whento to installe and on the 2nd disk found bad error i
> rebooted the Virtual machine did an install, full (i skip media check)
> no problems. I burn my slackware cds at the highest my cdburners will
> go in linux no problems. But again slackware does not push a cd all the
> way out to the rim.
>
>
> Larry Brown wrote:
>
> >I am using Imation CDR 700/80's. I have always had good burns with them
> >in the past. At work they have bought some of the gold disks and I have
> >terrible results with them and will no longer waste my time. I don't
> >know the material used by Imation.
> >
> >On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 10:02, Robert Snyder wrote:
> >
> >
> >>William Coulter wrote:
> >>
> >>I think the real question should be what media are you using and then
> >>what burner. on some machines cd's using a organic based dye do better
> >>then a syntechic based dye. Example the 3m colors cd-rs are syntechic
> >>where HP are organic. and so are Vertbatiums. There is a tool for
> >>windows that tells you the media code and what type of dye is being
> >>used. I dont know if there is a similar application for linux. I
> >>usually burn at 32 x and usually dont have a problem . I do also use
> >>dvd images when available as it saves on cd swaping.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>As I have asked before, what kind of cd burnner do you have?
> >>>
> >>>William
> >>>
> >>>--- Dean Shepherd <deanthecrabman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>When I downloaded Mandrake10.0, I could only get a
> >>>>clean enough copy when I burned at the slowest speed
> >>>>on my burner(2X). Otherwise, I kept getting corrupted
> >>>>files.
> >>>>--- William Coulter <wrcoulter30@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I downloaded FC3 and I had no problems. What kind
> >>>>>of cd burnner and what kind of cd drive are you
> >>>>>using? I have had problems with some older cd
> >>>>>drives. They have a hard time reading the cd's I
> >>>>>burn.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>William
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--- Larry Brown <larry.brown@dimensionnetworks.com>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:23, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Has anyone seen this? I have googled and only
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>see complaints about
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>upgrades failing because of this package. I
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>ran the cd tests with
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>positive results at the beginning of the
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>install, when I get to that
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>package it fails saying the file is corrupt.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>I re-downloaded FC3 disk 2
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>and burned it, then replaced the other disk.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>It still gives the same
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>message. Does anyone know how to get around
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>Interesting... It took me six burns before I got
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>a disk that passed the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>initial media check. The first were done at the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>default 4X. The failed disk 2
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>and disk 3 were reburned at 2X then finally at
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>1X before the media check
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>passed. I guessed that there was some issues
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>with the package being near the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>end of the list, and being such a large package.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>Dunno.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>BTW, I did have to make a few changes to the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>/etc/security settings to get
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>Nvidia to work properly.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>Hmmm, maybe I'll try burning it at a slower rate.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>I don't know why the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>burn rate would be any different from one
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>application to another. It
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>seems to me that if burning at a high rate for FC2
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>shouldn't be any
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>different than FC3. Binary is Binary right? Hmm.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>Well, since you
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>ultimately got it to work, I'll try some more.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Thanks...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>__________________________________________________
> >>>Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> >>>Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> >>>posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> >>>official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> >>Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> >>posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> >>official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> >Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> >posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> >official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
> >
> >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:35:28 EDT