>> Well, I originally said, "in the ultimate, worse case scenario," meaning
your machine is up, but your swap space has crashed and you want zero down
time.
Now I understand. Swap space is not an issue. Uptime is. My "ultimate,
worse case scenario" is to lose the root drive. That machine has 4GB RAM.
>> If you enjoy a plenitude of RAM, I guarantee you'll survive the process:
Only if you _never_ swap. If the OS is swapped to the disk, and it dies,
the kernel panics and reboots. And I've never seen an OS that would not
swap somewhat, even if it had plenty of RAM.
But thanks for the feedback...
Ken Elliott
=====================
-----Original Message-----
From: slug@nks.net [mailto:slug@nks.net] On Behalf Of Logan Tygart
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 5:36 PM
To: SLUG
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Is RAID worth doing?
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 17:10 -0400, Ken Elliott wrote:
> KE >> That doesn't do what I want.
>
> LT >> Actually, it does. Read closer.
>
> Then we don't understand each other. I re-read it and I am unable to
> understand how your suggestion has anything to do with hard drive
> fault tolerance. It looks like this is a solution to _extend_ the swap
space.
> How does this have anything to do with mirroring drives, including the
> swap partition?
Well, I originally said, "in the ultimate, worse case scenario," meaning
your machine is up, but your swap space has crashed and you want zero down
time. Yeah, this has nothing to do with fault tolerance, just a way to
survive, the worse case scenario. Mount a partition -- new or old and
employ the methodology already adumbrated by Matt Moen's article, to create
NEW swap space. Your kernel will use it.
I guess I am focusing on swap and you are focusing on RAID. In this regard,
the RAID is irrelevant. If your swap space has taken a dive, mount another
partition or create a swap file.
Worse case scenario. It works; I have suffered through it with zero down
time.
If you enjoy a plenitude of RAM, I guarantee you'll survive the process:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/3202
The Logan
-- When you look up redundant in the dictionary it says, "see redundant". -- Matt Miller, SLUG List Registered Linux User: 277727----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 14:42:24 EDT