> >So, with the lack of a Free alternative, NVidia is the much more
> >Freedom-friendly distributor in spite of the lack of a Free driver.
>
> But there _are_ free (libre) alternatives. The 'radeon' driver provides
> hardware accelerated 3D for several ATI chipsets. Intel has been working
> with Xorg developers and the 'i810' driver provides hardware accelerated 3D
> for several Intel chipsets. There is also the 'via' driver which provides
> accelerated 3D for VIA (Unichrome) chipsets.
>
> This is the hardware that Free (libre) Software advocates should be buying,
> promoting, and using. This is the hardware that offers you freedom _and_
> functionality out-of-the-box with most Linux distributions. For those who
> value freedom (and who desire 3D acceleration), NVIDIA should be the last
> choice.*
The Ati drivers are unacceptable. The i810 hardware is unacceptable.
I will, however, investigate the unichrome chipsets more thoroughly
the next time I acquire graphics hardware.
-- Tcsh: Now with higher FPS! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:28:59 EDT