On 1/9/07, steve szmidt <steve@szmidt.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 19:47, Chuck Hast wrote:
>
> > OK, this answered the other question. I will certainly take that into
> > account. I assume also that it is better to have a disk for the
> > OS/tools/swap and then a dedicated disk for the AV files, so that it is
> > only accessed when it is needed for the AV data and nothing else?
>
> Totally! :)
>
> An AV disk failure would not crash the system. Which I have to admit I had
> never seen before. I've run nonstop music for a long time without any
> problems whatsoever. But it makes sense that nonstop load is worse than
> sporadic load.
>
Good, that shall be my first step. I think I have enough stuff to get the test
bed going... It will be enough to demo what we want to do and then I can
make a pick list that we can start going down, they can add little by little.
-- Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT -- To paraphrase my flight instructor; "the only dumb question is the one you DID NOT ask resulting in my going out and having to identify your bits and pieces in the midst of torn and twisted metal." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:31:03 EDT