Re: [SLUG] W2K and RH 8.0 and NTFS

From: TheExploited (chinvi@streamyx.com)
Date: Tue Nov 12 2002 - 15:36:00 EST


Dear Michael,
         Yea i used to run win2k and RH7.2 before and lilo should do fine
managing everything. Considering the fact that RH7.2 has lba32 support so
i'd say you need not worry about RH8.0 . However i'm not to sure about
booting w2k with NTFS from lilo .But i know there's a known issue with
RH7.2 where you can't mount NTFS partitions Seems you have to upgrade your
kernel version to mount the NTFS partition. However you might want to try
out the GRUB boot loader rather than lilo.It has a neater interface and has
a nice interface.
Regards,
Victor

At 10:34 AM 11/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>While doing a search for dual booting W2K and Linux I came across an
>article that said that W2K with NTFS does not appear to call the Linux
>OS when attempting to boot linux.
>
>Does anyone have any input on this. My 'new' desktop at work is a W2K
>Dell and I have shrunk the W2K partition to leave room for RH 8.0. And
>I want to dual boot and would prefer to use LILO as by boot loader.
>
>Also has anyone done this with a large HD where the Linux /boot
>partition is beyond the 1024 Cyl barrier. The article seems to think
>that this part needs to be before 1024.
>
>Doesn't the new LILO have lba32 support? And I would think the bios in
>this new box would have it as well.
>
>
>Michael C Rock



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:39:26 EDT