-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:38 pm, Eben King wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Steve wrote:
> > On the other side, in times of war different rules apply. Question is
> > are we at that junction and will we get the freedom back once the war
> > is won?
>
> Will the war ever be over? There's no "fullfillment" or exit condition.
> If the war continues while there's "terrorism" (an ill-defined condition
> anyhow), there has been and will always be that in the world and in the
> US.
>
> > Besides all those minor points, I love anything that lowers
> > profitability for spammers.
>
> Thing is, the cost of participating is already so low... you have to make
> it actually _cost_ money to spam in order for that approach to work.
>
> > Now maybe we can use spam to stop spam. If we spam education about spam
> > with an alternative solution and then have special offers lists for
> > people to subscribe to, maybe that could have a decent degree of
> > workability.
>
> I would be pissed if a got anti-spam spam (not that I read UCE anyhow).
> It seems to me to be equivalent to an SMB popup advertising a
> popup-blocker. (Which I don't get... wrong OS, and my connection to the
> net has been NATted for several years.)
To be honest, I'd rather piss off everybody if it lowered spam. In the end
that's what would matter. It's not the same as selling popup blocker with
popup blockers because we are not selling anything. Our purpose is quite
different.
In reality it really does not matter how it's done (within legal limits) if
it gets the job done. Now it could be that it would be an exercise in
futility. But I'd rather do something than just sit around and moan about
it. I know I have for some time, but I could not come up with something
that seemed workable.
Not saying you are moaning, but as a way of approaching life. Doing nothing
is how we ended up with a corrupt government, and everything else that has
gone too far because we as a nation or a group were too lazy (or whatever)
to do something about it.
Paul here came up with an idea of doing something. He might not be into my
solution but he is trying to start something as a solution. You work it and
tune it until it's good. Even then you might end up needing to tune it.
Maybe my idea is a back-ass-ward way of doing it, maybe I end up hated by
everyone. Maybe I end up making a difference.
I'd mark the message going out clearly so as not to fool anyone. Include the
spam header for example. How it would be done is not clear to me, but I'm
sure something can be done to make it low profile for spam haters.
- --
Steve
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAdxunljK16xgETzkRAoUpAJ9tGcr2qjM/lwyMQ8m1TsbcNOnGXACgw9eV
/J4fgszqqqM1iUwl70tfojo=
=gCix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:21:15 EDT