Ken Elliott wrote:
>>>Here's what I'm interested in:
>>>2. 32 bit (*not* 64 bit)
>>>
>>>
>
>You might want to reconsider that. The Athlon 64 will run 32-bit software
>just fine. There is no downside to using it, plus it's fast, cheap, and
>allows you the option of changing to 64-bit code off in the distant future.
>
>I'd select it over a Pentium 4 in a heartbeat.
>
>Ken Elliott
>
>
See, that's what I'm talking about. I like my P4, but I really want an
Athalon 64. Well, we'll see if there are any good Christmas bonuses
coming...
-- --Michael Hast (the evyl robot) Always remember that too much pot spoils the cook, and if you have nothing to say at all, don't say anything nice.----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:03:49 EDT