did you try just modprobing scanner without the options? I don't
remember passing options to the scanner that I use, but I think I do
have USB hotplugging set up for it.
scott
Eric Jahn wrote:
>This is driving me completely loco. I have the latest SANE/Plustek
>drivers installed as per instructions. I also have all the usb stuff
>compiled in (other usb device works fine) and have compiled "usb
>scanner" as a module, but I can't get the scanner module to load for the
>usb scanner.
>
>when I try (as root)
>#modprobe scanner vendor=0x04b8 product=0x011d
>I get:
>----
>/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r1/kernel/drivers/usb/scanner.o: init_module:
>Operation not permitted
>Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters,
>including invalid IO or IRQ parameters.
> You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg
>/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r1/kernel/drivers/usb/scanner.o: insmod
>/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r1/kernel/drivers/usb/scanner.o failed
>/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r1/kernel/drivers/usb/scanner.o: insmod
>scanner failed"
>------
>But the usb system recognizes my scanner (here is the truncated cat
>/proc/bus/usb/devices output, notice it says driver=none):
>------
>P: Vendor=04b8 ProdID=011d Rev= 1.00
>S: Manufacturer=EPSON
>S: Product=EPSON Scanner
>C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr= 2mA
>I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=ff Driver=(none)
>E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=16ms
>E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms
>E: Ad=03(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms
>-------
>I also use a usb flash card reader that loads fine.
>
>As you might have guessed, sane-find-scanner -v finds nothing.
>
>/var/log/kernel says:
>------
>[kernel] hub.c: new USB device 00:11.2-2,
>assigned address 3Apr 19 14:46:01 [kernel] usb.c: USB device 3
>(vend/prod
>0x4b8/0x11d) is not claimed by any active driver. [kernel] usb.c: error
>registering usbscanner driverApr 19 23:23:45 Apr 20 00:02:02
>[kernel] usb.c: USB disconnect on device 00:11.2-2 address 3
>Apr 20 00:02:22
>-------
>and dmesg says the same thing. Does anyone know any way to troubleshoot
>this? thank you!
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:18:50 EDT